# Editorial review: project brief summary

Review a deliberately flawed fictional article using the supplied research notes.

Produce a faithful summary of no more than 80 words, a scored editorial review, specific issues linked to evidence where available, and a revised article of no more than 250 words. Keep the summary of the original separate from the corrected revision.

Score factual accuracy out of 30, evidence and attribution out of 25, usefulness out of 20, clarity out of 15, and structure out of 10. Explain each score as an editorial judgment. Distinguish unsupported claims from claims contradicted by the supplied evidence.

Build a self-contained page for comparing the original and revision, reading the review, and downloading the results. Support desktop, phones, and keyboard navigation with no external dependencies. Remove unsupported performance guarantees from the revision.

This is a summary of the example project brief, not a verbatim session transcript.